Beldar on the deal
By krempasky Posted in Fillibuster — Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Bill Dyer is far, far smarter than I - and he thinks the Republicans got completely snookered when you get into what the deal actually says. He's probably right as a matter of law - I'm not sure if he's on as solid ground when it comes to the politics. Deals in the Senate are as binding as the signatories want them to be (budget deals/resolutions, anyone?) - so if the moderate Republicans really were looking for a way to avoid a vote, perhaps he's right.
On the other hand, if those who participated (sans McCain, his ego is like Obi-Wan, just try and strike it down) want the opportunity to seem like elder statesmen and then get "forced" by the Democrats into voting later to drop the filibuster, well - that's just as plausible.
One thing's clear: this is a delay, not a final disposition.

Recent comments
SG is certainly possible
(2 years 19 weeks ago)Kathleen Sullivan earns a victory; what might be in her future?
(2 years 19 weeks ago)vote scheduled Tuesday for Obama's first district court nominee
(2 years 19 weeks ago)Мысли...
(2 years 19 weeks ago)Ginsburg hospitalized after feeling faint
(2 years 19 weeks ago)Sotomayor joins cert pool
(2 years 19 weeks ago)Carl Tobias 9/23 article on filling 2nd Circuit COA vacancies
(2 years 19 weeks ago)Thx
(2 years 20 weeks ago)Great blog!
(2 years 20 weeks ago)It appears that Sonia Sotomayor has placed herself
(2 years 20 weeks ago)