Brownback removes his block on the Neff nomination

By Feddie Posted in Comments (12) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

This was the right decision by Brownback. Every judicial nominee deserves an up-or-down vote within a reasonable period of time; and it was inappropriate of Brownback to attempt to condition his vote on Neff agreeing to recuse herself from any gay marriage cases.

I have to say though, I am not at all heartened by what I’ve read about Neff thus far. In a nutshell, she does not strike me as a judicial conservative, and one is only left to wonder why in the world President Bush nominated her in the first place.

Well, the president did nominate Harriet Miers, so I guess that explains the Neff nomination (in part), now doesn’t it?

deal by AC1

Isn't she the liberal nominee as part of the deal with Levin? That is why she was nominated.

Reply To ThisUser Info#1 — Tue, 2006-12-19 22:31

I am not so sure that Brownback won't continue to milk the Neff nomination for all it's worth. He needs an issue to encourage interest in his presidential run. I think he will threaten Leahy and Reid with blocking Neff anytime he feels he needs some attention in the conservative press. I don't think we (or the Democrats) will be free of his machinations until Neff is actually confirmed. Unfortunately, this is the world of politics.

Reply To ThisUser Info#2 — Tue, 2006-12-19 23:11

This is one of those housekeeping things Frist should have handled before he left. He should have broken Brownback's hold, forced votes on all the Michigan judges at the same time. Brownback is grandstanding, and although I tend to agree with him on most issues, this is not the time or place to do it.

Reply To ThisUser Info#3 — Wed, 2006-12-20 08:02

I agree with Robert.

What will happen now is the following:
1) Neff will be confirmed very early in the session. (If necessary Reid will file a cloture motion)
2) This will clear the path for 12 other nominees to be confirmed.
3) Leahy will be yelling: "We have confirmed 13 judges in 2 months. That is more than 1/3 of the number the GOP achieved in 24 months."
4) And now Leahy has all the excuses to do nothing on judges untill July or so.

Reply To ThisUser Info#4 — Wed, 2006-12-20 08:54
olly by Matthew Friendly

olly, what you say may in fact happen, and if it does, I'll be pretty happy with it. That would be more action on judges than we've seen in a long time.

Robert1 is right. This issue should have been dealt with in the lame duck session, as both sides have a stake in it. It could have been resolved and all the Michigan judges could have been confirmed, if Specter and Frist had the integrity to do their jobs.

Reply To ThisUser Info#5 — Wed, 2006-12-20 09:29
feddie by Matthew Friendly

feddie, I finally read your post, and I'm wondering how it is you don't know why Bush nominated Neff. He compromised on Neff to get the other Michigan vacancies filled with people he likes.

Reply To ThisUser Info#6 — Wed, 2006-12-20 09:31

What I should have said is: One has to wonder why the president continues to compromise with the dems by appointing liberals to the bench to get his real nominees through.

Reply To ThisUser Info#7 — Wed, 2006-12-20 09:53

Feddie,

I agree with your sentiment, but I'm afraid this is how things will go for the next 2 years. I'd love to have Haynes and Myers on the CCs, but it won't happen. We will need to be like Reagan, take 80% where we can get it, and come back for more if possible.

If Reid and Leahy are really ready to pass 13 judges, they might be willing to do even more if the WH threw them a bone or two. Dump the Five, create a new seat for Helene White, give them one pick on the 4th, in return for approving additional judges. We got creamed in the elections, so now our judicial nominating process just got gummed up, too. We can either be smart or stupid as to how we proceed. Let's take the half loaf approach, because leaving the seats open is only something the "stupid party" would think to do.

Reply To ThisUser Info#8 — Wed, 2006-12-20 11:00
I know, I know by Feddie

I am just not happy about it.

Reply To ThisUser Info#9 — Wed, 2006-12-20 14:20

From the below thread:

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20061219/D8M436BG0.html

Brownback wants to requestion Neff about gay marriage OR have her recuse herself from any cases on it?

Now there's a good idea. "Judge Brown, I know the Judiciary Committee has sent your nomination to the full Senate, but I'd like to requestion you about abortion and if you don't answer you must agree to recuse yourself from all abortion cases, else I will not allow your nomination to proceed." - Ted Kennedy(hic!), 9/13/07

I'm hardly thrilled with Neff, but it is what it is, and IMO this requestion or recuse idea is even worse than just holding a nominee.

Sam, you're not going to be POTUS or VPOTUS. Your doing the country a great disservice, and it needs to stop. A deal was made; it's not perfect, but it's the best we can do (assuming Keth & Murph get confirmed too. Guess I can choke down a new seat for WHite, too).

So, knock it off.

Reply To ThisUser Info#10 — Wed, 2006-12-20 15:10

Brownback may not like Neff, and from what little I've heard I don't either, but Bush gave his word and it needs to be honored. If we back out of the deal, we're no better than they are, and that's a pretty low bar.

Of course, we could adopt the Leahy standard and say "You should have put it in writing" - shudder the thought.

Reply To ThisUser Info#11 — Wed, 2006-12-20 15:24
I agree by Oz

with all of Robert's posts from above. We made a deal, we stick with it. If the Dems back away from them, we roast them.

Reply To ThisUser Info#12 — Thu, 2006-12-21 12:06


Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative weblog organized by RedState dedicated to providing not only the most up-to-date news and analysis of the judicial confirmation battles in the United States Senate - but also giving every American the opportunity to let their voice be heard in Washington. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments

©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service