Feinstein's Questions

By Marshall Manson Posted in Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

“While questioning Judge Roberts, Sen. Feinstein stated that, in the last decade, the Supreme Court had struck down three dozen federal statutes under the Commerce Clause. In reality, U.S. v. Lopez (1995) and U.S. v. Morrison (2000) are the only two instances since the New Deal in which the Court invalidated legislation – involving the quintessentially local issues of gun possession near schools and gender-motivated violence respectively – on grounds that it was not a regulation of interstate commerce.

Sen. Feinstein is not alone. To hear Senators Kennedy, Schumer and their colleagues fret, you would think the Rehnquist Court had been striking down federal statutes under the Commerce Clause right and left. The truth is that the Court did so only when even a generous stretching of the constitutional authority to ‘regulate Commerce . . . among the several States’ could not accommodate the statute at issue.�

– Curt Levey, General Counsel, Committee for Justice




Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative blog hosted by RedState and dedicated to confirmation of judicial nominees who will uphold the original intended meaning of the Constitution, using judicial restraint. Until 2009, this blog provided news and analysis regarding judicial confirmation battles in the U.S. Senate, and gave every American the opportunity to be heard in Washington. Now this blog is in a holding pattern, awaiting judicial nominations we can support. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments



©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service