Feinstein's Questions
By Marshall Manson Posted in Roberts — Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
“While questioning Judge Roberts, Sen. Feinstein stated that, in the last decade, the Supreme Court had struck down three dozen federal statutes under the Commerce Clause. In reality, U.S. v. Lopez (1995) and U.S. v. Morrison (2000) are the only two instances since the New Deal in which the Court invalidated legislation – involving the quintessentially local issues of gun possession near schools and gender-motivated violence respectively – on grounds that it was not a regulation of interstate commerce.
Sen. Feinstein is not alone. To hear Senators Kennedy, Schumer and their colleagues fret, you would think the Rehnquist Court had been striking down federal statutes under the Commerce Clause right and left. The truth is that the Court did so only when even a generous stretching of the constitutional authority to ‘regulate Commerce . . . among the several States’ could not accommodate the statute at issue.�
– Curt Levey, General Counsel, Committee for Justice

Recent comments
SG is certainly possible
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Kathleen Sullivan earns a victory; what might be in her future?
(2 years 34 weeks ago)vote scheduled Tuesday for Obama's first district court nominee
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Мысли...
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Ginsburg hospitalized after feeling faint
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Sotomayor joins cert pool
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Carl Tobias 9/23 article on filling 2nd Circuit COA vacancies
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Thx
(2 years 35 weeks ago)Great blog!
(2 years 35 weeks ago)It appears that Sonia Sotomayor has placed herself
(2 years 35 weeks ago)