Friedrich for DC District Court?

By aurel Posted in Comments (9) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Word has it that former Associate White House Counsel Dabney Friedrich will be nominated to fill a seat on the DC District Court. Mrs. Friedrich would replace Gladys Kessler (a Clinton appointment known as one of the most liberal members of the DC District Court), who took senior status last month.

In other news, according to court insider Jan Crawford Greenburg, Justice Stevens is not planning to retire any time soon. He is "busy fighting for the soul of Justice Kennedy", and no further retirements are expected during President's Bush remaining term in office.

UPDATE FROM ANDREW [3:04 PM]: Just to clarify, the Kessler seat is on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, rather than the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

will be argued Wed. April 25

Reply To ThisUser Info#1 — Mon, 2007-02-05 14:11
Hmm... by EzOnTheEyez

So then she's not being nominated to the DC Circuit. She's being nominated to the DC District Court, which is in the DC Circuit.

Aren't there some vacancies on the 4th Circuit that Ms. Friedrich might be well qualified for??

Reply To ThisUser Info#2 — Mon, 2007-02-05 16:07

I have not seen her name listed anywhere as a Thomas clerk. Are you sure about this? The White House resume that you link to doesn't mention it, and neither does the list I have from the Supreme Court.

Reply To ThisUser Info#3 — Mon, 2007-02-05 17:31

http://www.slate.com/id/2158863/

Hyperliberal whining, of course, but interesting. I guess.

Rosen's book sounds fascinating.

Reply To ThisUser Info#4 — Mon, 2007-02-05 20:38
Off-Topic Question by evanm85

New post from JCG's blog hints that everyone's asking her about possible judicial vacancies. Everyone's been talking about JPS and RBG bailing due to age and/or health issues, but, as has been noted, Souter is looking rather haggard, himself. Is there any validity to the rumor that he's pining for New Hampshire, and wants to retire in the near future?

Reply To ThisUser Info#5 — Mon, 2007-02-05 20:43

I think neither Stevens or Souter will retire under Bush II because both regard him as an illegitimate president. I also do not believe, contrary to some reports, that either feels any allegiance to the Republican Party. Rather, I think both feel vilified by conservative Republicans and have no intention of giving conservatives control of the Supreme Court by retiring under Bush. I think only health will intervene to force either to retire in the next two years.

Reply To ThisUser Info#6 — Tue, 2007-02-06 08:54

Lazarus is a whiney left winger.

Reply To ThisUser Info#7 — Tue, 2007-02-06 09:48
Bobo's right by cubsfan

According to JCG's book and recent comments, no Justice currently seems to be thinking about retirement.

On another note, it is encouraging to hear McConnell and Senate Republicans at least talking about judges as a top priority in this Hill article:

http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/020607/mcconnel...

Reply To ThisUser Info#8 — Tue, 2007-02-06 10:33

Bobo, Andrew: sorry, yesterday was not my day. Several serious errors in my post. My apologies. Hopefully all now corrected.

Reply To ThisUser Info#9 — Tue, 2007-02-06 12:57


Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative weblog organized by RedState dedicated to providing not only the most up-to-date news and analysis of the judicial confirmation battles in the United States Senate - but also giving every American the opportunity to let their voice be heard in Washington. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments

©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service