Hearings Pronto

By AndrewHyman Posted in Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Here's one vote for hearings sooner rather than later. Let's not drag this out like last time. And then, during the hearings, perhaps we'll find out if the nominee is willing to strike down statutes that are clearly consistent with the Constitution, merely because of some misplaced reverence for stare decisis. And, we'll find out if the nominee agrees or disagrees with Justices Scalia and Thomas that the notion of "substantive due process" is a load of c**p.

Anyway, sincere congratulations to Ms. Miers. She'd certainly diversify the Court. But I'd rather have a nice homogeneous Court that does the right thing. If we can have both, so much the better.

UPDATE: On a humorous note, don't miss this blog set up by someone claiming to be Judge Luttig. Hat Tip: UTR.




Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative blog hosted by RedState and dedicated to confirmation of judicial nominees who will uphold the original intended meaning of the Constitution, using judicial restraint. Until 2009, this blog provided news and analysis regarding judicial confirmation battles in the U.S. Senate, and gave every American the opportunity to be heard in Washington. Now this blog is in a holding pattern, awaiting judicial nominations we can support. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments



©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service