If There's a Supreme Court Vacancy This Week . . .
By AndrewHyman Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
I hope this question will be asked of the nominee during the confirmation hearing:
Suppose a case comes before you that requires a choice between two options. Option number one is endorsed by the "mainstream" of this country's legal community, and is really the most compassionate and fair choice for the parties involved in the case. Option number two is to uphold the clearly intended meaning of the Constitution, which is different from option number one. Will you choose option number one or two?
Any nominee who says "option number one" should be voted down, and sent to Siberia, if the Russians are willing to accept such a disgraceful immigrant.
UPDATE: A reporter in Huntsville, Alabama directs a bit of sarcasm at Fox News for excessive coverage of a possible Rehnquist retirement announcement. Also, a possible Gonzales nomination is discussed by Mike Krempasky and others, over at Redstate (I'm with Mike).

Recent comments
SG is certainly possible
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Kathleen Sullivan earns a victory; what might be in her future?
(2 years 34 weeks ago)vote scheduled Tuesday for Obama's first district court nominee
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Мысли...
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Ginsburg hospitalized after feeling faint
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Sotomayor joins cert pool
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Carl Tobias 9/23 article on filling 2nd Circuit COA vacancies
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Thx
(2 years 35 weeks ago)Great blog!
(2 years 35 weeks ago)It appears that Sonia Sotomayor has placed herself
(2 years 35 weeks ago)