Kristol
By DanCT Posted in SCOTUS — Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
As Nathan pointed out, Bill Kristol is quite pessimistic about next week: O'Conner steps down, and Bush nominates Gonzales as CJ. He states clearly the consequences of such a move:
A Gonzales nomination would, in my view, virtually forfeit any chance in the near term for a fundamental reversal in the downward drift of American constitutional jurisprudence.
He is right about what the consequences would be, but I'm betting Bush is both smarter and more politically gutsy than to nominate Gonzales in order to "overcome a threatened Democratic filibuster".

Recent comments
SG is certainly possible
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Kathleen Sullivan earns a victory; what might be in her future?
(2 years 34 weeks ago)vote scheduled Tuesday for Obama's first district court nominee
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Мысли...
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Ginsburg hospitalized after feeling faint
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Sotomayor joins cert pool
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Carl Tobias 9/23 article on filling 2nd Circuit COA vacancies
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Thx
(2 years 35 weeks ago)Great blog!
(2 years 35 weeks ago)It appears that Sonia Sotomayor has placed herself
(2 years 35 weeks ago)