Lieberman Is Historically-Challenged
By DanCT Posted in Senate Rules — Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
Writing for MSNBC, Tom Curry quotes the Senator from Connecticut:
“The end of the 60-vote requirement,� said Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., would mean the end of “the minimal demand that there be more than members of one party to confirm presidential nominations to our highest courts.�
There has never been any demand that nominees get support from both parties. The only demand for confirmation has been that a majority of the Senate expresses its support. Only when the Senate and White House have been controlled by opposing parties has there been a demand that nominees get support from both parties (which only occurred for 13% of Supreme Court appointments prior to Nixon; after Nixon, though, 2/3 of the SCOTUS appointments were with split party control). Lieberman is advocating a new standard but apparently doesn't realize it. If he knew what he was doing, I don't think he'd approve.

Recent comments
SG is certainly possible
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Kathleen Sullivan earns a victory; what might be in her future?
(2 years 34 weeks ago)vote scheduled Tuesday for Obama's first district court nominee
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Мысли...
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Ginsburg hospitalized after feeling faint
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Sotomayor joins cert pool
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Carl Tobias 9/23 article on filling 2nd Circuit COA vacancies
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Thx
(2 years 35 weeks ago)Great blog!
(2 years 35 weeks ago)It appears that Sonia Sotomayor has placed herself
(2 years 35 weeks ago)