Lieberman Is Historically-Challenged

By DanCT Posted in Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Writing for MSNBC, Tom Curry quotes the Senator from Connecticut:

“The end of the 60-vote requirement,� said Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., would mean the end of “the minimal demand that there be more than members of one party to confirm presidential nominations to our highest courts.�

There has never been any demand that nominees get support from both parties. The only demand for confirmation has been that a majority of the Senate expresses its support. Only when the Senate and White House have been controlled by opposing parties has there been a demand that nominees get support from both parties (which only occurred for 13% of Supreme Court appointments prior to Nixon; after Nixon, though, 2/3 of the SCOTUS appointments were with split party control). Lieberman is advocating a new standard but apparently doesn't realize it. If he knew what he was doing, I don't think he'd approve.




Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative blog hosted by RedState and dedicated to confirmation of judicial nominees who will uphold the original intended meaning of the Constitution, using judicial restraint. Until 2009, this blog provided news and analysis regarding judicial confirmation battles in the U.S. Senate, and gave every American the opportunity to be heard in Washington. Now this blog is in a holding pattern, awaiting judicial nominations we can support. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments



©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service