More on the Warner-Byrd Draft Compromise

By AndrewHyman Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

The Washington Times has some more details about what Senators Warner and Byrd are suggesting:

Sen. John W. Warner, Virginia Republican, and Sen. Robert C. Byrd, West Virginia Democrat, are among those looking for a compromise and made a proposal that was offered as legislation in an earlier Congress by Mr. Specter.

Under the proposal, a bipartisan group in the Senate "would establish a pool of men and women to be considered for any vacancy on the Supreme Court," according to a press release yesterday. "The committee would submit this group of names to the president. The president could select from that list, if he chooses, or pick someone completely different."

If this compromise entails up-or-down votes for all of the pending majority-supported nominees, then it may be a decent compromise, provided there is no suggestion that the "list" would amount to "advice" within the meaning of the Constitution. The Constitution is very clear that "advice and consent" refers to advice given after a nomination is submitted to the Senate.




Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative blog hosted by RedState and dedicated to confirmation of judicial nominees who will uphold the original intended meaning of the Constitution, using judicial restraint. Until 2009, this blog provided news and analysis regarding judicial confirmation battles in the U.S. Senate, and gave every American the opportunity to be heard in Washington. Now this blog is in a holding pattern, awaiting judicial nominations we can support. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments



©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service