Reid's Version of Senate Rules
By AndrewHyman Posted in Senate Rules — Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
It's not Reid's version of history that I'm worried about. It's his version of Senate rules that is the main problem, as described in a letter to the Washington Times yesterday.
Reid claims that the previously filibustered judicial nominees, "have been turned down by the Senate." I don't think Reid was lying. He was just repeating what other Democratic Senators (like Durbin and Schumer) have already admitted. These nominees were rejected. And, they were rejected in a way that completely violated the Senate's own rules.
In the case of these nominees, they were rejected, but NOT by majority vote. The GOP Senators ought to wake up and enforce Rule 31. The Democratic Senators who voted against these nominations did not intend to further explore the merits, or further try to convince the other side. Instead, they voted against cloture in order to kill the nominations.
That kind of behavior might be all well and good when the Senate is considering legislation, but Senate Rule 31 forbids it for nominations.

Recent comments
SG is certainly possible
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Kathleen Sullivan earns a victory; what might be in her future?
(2 years 34 weeks ago)vote scheduled Tuesday for Obama's first district court nominee
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Мысли...
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Ginsburg hospitalized after feeling faint
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Sotomayor joins cert pool
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Carl Tobias 9/23 article on filling 2nd Circuit COA vacancies
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Thx
(2 years 35 weeks ago)Great blog!
(2 years 35 weeks ago)It appears that Sonia Sotomayor has placed herself
(2 years 35 weeks ago)