ConfirmThem

Posted at 3:44pm on Mar. 17, 2009 Hamilton is no "moderate"

By Feddie

And so it begins.

Let's see how long it will take before Professor Kmiec writes an op-ed explaining how legal conservatives should celebrate Hamilton's appointment to the Seventh Circuit.

Update: And, of course, CNN is calling Hamilton a "moderate."

Also, and to no one's surprise, Senator Lugar is praising Obama's appointment of Hamilton.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (30) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 12:47pm on Mar. 17, 2009 Even Dellinger Says Obama Should Go With Moderates

By Quin

My latest at the Examiner. Money quote has Dellinger saying conservative judicial philosophy is an electoral winner:
http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/columns/QuinHillyer/Quin-essential-Cas...

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (0) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 10:43am on Jan. 6, 2009 Case for Keisler

By Quin

I know it's probably like spitting into the wind, but here I make the case for Obama to renominated Peter Keisler: http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/columns/QuinHillyer/Quin-essential_cas...
Then again, the Bush administration's utter failure to use its Roger Gregory olive branch to better PR effect was a huge missed opportunity that helped make it more difficult to confirm people like Keisler in the first place.
Comments welcome.
I also will try to cross-post at Southern Appeal, if my own computer glitches (I am using a new machine at work) don't get in the way.)

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (17) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 7:02pm on Jul. 24, 2008 Pratter Out, Diamond In

By Curt Levey

Per a deal worked out by Sens. Specter and Casey and ratified by the White House, the nomination of Gene Pratter to the Third Circuit was withdrawn, and U.S. District Court Judge Paul Diamond was named in her place late today.

The deal also includes the nomination today of four district court judges for Pennsylvania: C. Darnell Jones II, Mitchell Goldberg, Joel Slomsky, and Carolyn Short (renomination).

Because Diamond and 4th Circuit nominee Glen Conrad are bipartisan picks, they are likely to be confirmed. As a result, there will be at least 12 circuit court confirmations in the 110th Congress.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (21) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 6:53pm on Jun. 24, 2008 Two Circuit Court Nominees Confirmed Including One Nominated by Clinton

By AndrewHyman

Congratulations to Raymond Kethledge who was confirmed to the Sixth Circuit today. Helene White was also confirmed today, and perhaps President Bush will now appoint her to the Sixth Circuit. Bush's decision to nominate her was an extremely generous act of bipartisanship, on a par with President Bush's nomination of Roger Gregory to the Fourth Circuit. I'm not certain that it's proper for Bush to nominate judges whose judicial philosophy disagrees with his own, but I am fairly certain that Bush's magnanimity will not diminish the obstruction in the Senate.

Now that the Senate has confirmed this Clinton nominee, it's probably back to obstruction mode for non-Clinton nominees Glen Conrad, Robert Conrad, Peter Keisler, Steve Matthews, Gene Pratter, Rod Rosenstein, William Smith, and Shalom David Stone. Timely hearings and prompt votes for judicial nominees are not likely any time soon, thanks to Reid, Leahy, Obama, and company.

Helene White was the wife of Senator Carl Levin's cousin. In 1996, White was considering an independent bid for the Michigan Supreme Court, at the expense of the Democratic candidate for state supreme court. Michigan Democrats therefore persuaded Bill Clinton to nominate White to the Sixth Circuit. Clinton did so, even though then-Sen. Spencer Abraham had already traded his help with three Michigan judicial nominees to the federal courts, in exchange for Clinton holding off on further nominations from Michigan. Sen. Abraham felt double-crossed by Clinton's nomination of White, and Abraham therefore placed a hold on her nomination. Now she's very likely to join the Sixth Circuit.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (20) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 12:47pm on Jun. 20, 2008 Richard Bennett

By Quin

Can any readers out there tell me anything about Maryland federal district judge Richard Bennett, in terms of how conservative/textualist/originalist he may or may not be?
Thanks.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (7) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 10:04am on Jun. 19, 2008 What a GOP Senator Should Say

By Quin

BoBo was kind enough to link to it in the threads under my last post, but I now take the opportunity to elevate to a new thread my latest Spectator column, here, about the message the GOP senators ought to be driving home on the Senate floor. It is meant as a supplement to the admirable efforts of McConnell, Specter, and others.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (32) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 10:38am on Jun. 17, 2008 Spitting Into a Maryland Wind

By Quin

Just to make sure we don't forget another good man who the Dems are holding up for no good reason, we at the Washington Examiner today take up the case of Rod Rosenstein (here). Our sister publication in Baltimore did the same last week, here.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (28) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 10:02am on May 28, 2008 Examiner on Reid's broken promise

By Quin

Today's Examiner editorial (here) takes Harry Reid and Patrick Leahy to task, quite strongly, for their lies and hypocrisy.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (9) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 5:43pm on May 22, 2008 McConnell: Reid Fails the Lott Standard

By Curt Levey

On the Senate floor today, Sen. McConnell eloquently explained that Sen. Reid has failed to live up to the standard of commitment set by then-Majority Leader Lott, who made good on his promise to get up-or-down votes for controversial 9th Circuit Clinton nominees Paez and Berzon. McConnell’s full remarks are here and excerpts are below:

In the final year of President Clinton’s final Congress, two of his circuit court nominees, Richard Paez and Marsha Berzon, were pending in the Judiciary Committee. They were quite controversial.
…
Majority Leader Lott committed to proceed to the Paez and Berzon nominations by March 15 of the following year, which was, of course, a Presidential election year, just as this year is.
…
Given that many in our Conference and over 300 groups opposed these nominations, it would have been easier in many respects for Majority Leader Lott not to fulfill his commitment. He could have taken a hands-off approach, shrugged his shoulders, and put the onus on Chairman Hatch to make good on the Majority Leader’s own commitment.
…
But Senator Lott understood that commitments in this body are not to be taken lightly, especially when they are made by the Majority Leader. So, true to his word, Majority Leader Lott worked to ensure that his commitment was kept. The Paez and Berzon nominations were reported out of the Committee, and Majority Leader Lott filed cloture on them.
…
Judges Paez and Berzon were confirmed, and have been sitting on the Ninth Circuit for eight years because Senator Lott honored his commitment.
…
Unfortunately, a similar commitment made to my Conference was not honored today.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (26) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 4:04pm on May 22, 2008 Cornyn Denounces Reid

By Curt Levey

Sen. John Cornyn released a statement this afternoon decrying Majority Leader Reid’s failure to live up to his promise to confirm three circuit nominees before the Memorial Day recess, which begins Saturday. Cornyn notes that Reid could easily have kept his promise – think Matthews, Conrad and Keisler – and warns that there will be repercussions. See here for the full statement and below for an excerpt.

It is inexcusable that the Majority Leader broke his commitment … despite knowing there were long-pending nominees who could be confirmed before the deadline. He had ample opportunity to honor his pledge … I fear that the Majority Leader’s unwillingness to confirm judges will have negative consequences not only for our federal judiciary, but the Senate’s broader agenda.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (3) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 3:27pm on May 19, 2008 Reid Blames GOP for Failure to Meet His Promise

By Quin

Of course this is disingenuous as hell, but it is exactly what I predicted from the very start. If the GOP doesn't "shut down the Senate" over this, they have no spines. Personally, I think the best time to "shut down the Senate" would be either right after Agee gets confirmed, or else AFTER Bush vetoes the Farm Bill, with the shutdown making it impossible for the Senate to override the farm bill in time. But I digress. Here's Reid's statement:

REID: DEMOCRATS REMAIN COMMITTED TO CONFIRMING THREE JUDGES BEFORE RECESS

Washington, DC—Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made the following statement today on the floor of the U.S. Senate regarding nominations to the federal bench. Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:

“Tomorrow I expect the Senate will consider the nomination of Steven Agee to a Virginia seat on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Judge Agee is currently a member of the Virginia Supreme Court. His nomination to the federal bench is supported by both Senators Warner and Webb, and I am confident that he will be confirmed overwhelmingly. (MORE)

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (17) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 10:20am on May 9, 2008 What About William Smith??

By Quin

Does anybody have a good idea of what the political prospects are for First Circuit nominee William Smith? He was once chief of staff for Chafee; does that make him more acceptable to Dems, or does it mean that Whitehouse will block him because his Whitehouse's campaign against Chafee got pretty nasty? I'm all for getting confirmed ANY nominee actually chosen by the Bush White House, even if they aren't sperb conservatives.
A secondary consideration: Does that seat "belong" to Rhode Island? If not, and if Smith has no chance because Rhode Island Dems won't allow him through with their blue slips, is there a chance a New Hampshire nominee could be put forth and confirmed instead? Somebody like recently confirmed U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante comes to mind; he was confirmed with no opposition, and with very nice words from Leahy; and he is apparently a good law-and-order guy, a longtime prosecutor.
What I am thinking is for the summer, after the Conrad/Matthews/Keisler things have played out (in whichever way they do play out), the goal should be to help the Dems get closer to the appropriate number of appellate confirmations by giving them noncontroversial folks like Agee, the Virginia Conrad, and either WIlliam Smith or a substitute like LaPlante.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (13) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 2:40pm on Apr. 29, 2008 Specter, McConnell Send Letter

By Quin

Without comment, I post this letter, sent today:

April 29, 2008

The Honorable Harry Reid The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy

Majority Leader Chairman

United States Senate Senate Committee on the Judiciary

S-221 Capitol Building 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senators Reid and Leahy:

We write to express our serious concern regarding statements made by Chairman Leahy during last week’s Judiciary Committee Executive Business Meeting. In discussing Senator Reid’s April 15, 2008 commitment[1] to confirm three more circuit court nominations before the Memorial Day recess, Senator Specter asked Chairman Leahy to clarify whether he was saying he would not honor the commitment if the scheduling was not “convenient for the two Michigan nominees.” In response, Chairman Leahy stated, “I will do everything possible to get it [done] by Memorial Day, but if the White House slow walks [the Michigan nominees’ paperwork], we probably won’t.”[2] (MORE)

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (54) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 8:49am on Apr. 24, 2008 GOP Senators React as Leahy Guts Judges Deal

By Curt Levey

All nine Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have joined the chorus calling on Sens. Pat Leahy and Harry Reid to show good faith in implementing their agreement with Minority Leader McConnell to confirm three circuit court nominees by Memorial Day. In their letter yesterday , the Republican senators remind Judiciary Chairman Leahy that he has not responded to their previous letters about 4th Circuit nominees Bob Conrad and Steve Matthews, and address the necessity of including both nominees and DC Circuit nominee Peter Keisler in the Memorial Day deal:

[W]e believe, that as a matter of fairness, those promised three should include Judge Conrad, Mr. Matthews, and Mr. Keisler. Failing to include those three is unfair both to these nominees, who have been pending in Committee for over 270, 220, and 660 days respectively, but also to the litigants in the Fourth Circuit who are shackled with an appellate court that is one-third vacant. Further, we are concerned that more than a week after the Majority Leader’s commitment, a hearing for only one circuit nominee, Justice Steven Agee of Virginia, has been scheduled. … ‘Doing everything [you] can’ surely means holding a hearing for Judge Conrad and Mr. Matthews, and in Mr. Keisler’s case, a Committee vote.

The new letter to Sen. Leahy was spurred, in part, by his announcement yesterday of a hearing for Fourth Circuit nominee Agee, who was nominated just last month and received his required American Bar Association rating just this week. That stands in stark contrast to the months and years of delay for Keisler, Conrad, and Matthews. By moving Agee ahead of other circuit nominees, Leahy deepened the widespread suspicion that he and Reid will try to evade good faith implementation of the Memorial Day deal by claiming credit for circuit court nominees that were already part of other deals with Democrats. Agee and Sixth Circuit nominees Helene White and Ray Kethledge fall in that category.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (34) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 8:01am on Apr. 23, 2008 WSJ on Judges Deal; CFJ Founder Honored

By Curt Levey

In the wake of last week’s Senate deal on judicial nominations, today’s Wall Street Journal joins the voices noting the desirability of filling in the blanks in the deal with the names of circuit court nominees Peter Keisler, Bob Conrad, and Steve Matthews.

The Journal editorial describes the problem:

Democrats would rather fill pending vacancies with candidates who are either their patronage choices or pass muster with liberal interest groups. … As a compromise package, [6th Circuit nominees] Mr. Kethledge and Ms. White now look like a tantalizing way for Democrats to fulfill the McConnell-Reid deal to confirm three Circuit nominees by Memorial Day. Adding those two to Senator Webb's choice of Mr. Agee for the Fourth Circuit would allow Democrats to make good on the Memorial Day goal without confirming any of Mr. Bush's first-string nominees on the merits.

Note that Ray Kethledge is a first-string nominee, but will be confirmed as part of a separate deal, rather than “on the merits.”

None of this diminishes Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s accomplishment in securing the 3-by-Memorial-Day deal using the limited leverage afforded by a highway funding bill. But, as the Journal editorial points out, “GOP Senators need to use their minority rights now to insist that Democrats honor their pledge by confirming three bona fide Bush nominees.” As to which three, the Committee for Justice wholeheartedly agrees with the Journal that “Republican Arlen Specter has the right idea in requesting a discharge petition to confirm Peter Keisler on the D.C. Circuit, plus Robert Conrad and Steve Matthews on the Fourth Circuit.“

The Journal notes that the yet to be determined details of the Memorial Day deal have implications for the next president:

John McCain is supporting Mr. Specter's plan, and urging the confirmation of Messrs. Keisler, Conrad and Matthews for the Memorial Day deal. Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama aren't. The two Democrats are only inviting trouble for themselves if they should make it to the White House. Republicans are sure to invoke the Harry Reid precedent to derail their nominees.

The deal also has important implications for the election itself:

Republicans need to make judges an issue so voters understand that the stakes on the federal appellate courts, including the Supreme Court, couldn't be higher in 2008.

The role of the judges issue in the ’08 election is sure to be one of the topics debated at Friday’s 9th annual Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA) Policy Conference in DC. Thursday evening, the RNLA honors the Committee for Justice’s founder and first chairman, C. Boyden Gray, with its Edwin Meese Award. Mr. Gray was White House Counsel under the first President Bush and now serves as Special Envoy for European Union Affairs. Upon assuming the EU post, Gray was replaced by CFJ’s current chairman, former Energy Secretary and U.S. Senator Spencer Abraham.

UPDATE (April 23): This morning, Sen. Leahy announced a May 1 hearing for Fourth Circuit nominee Steven Agee. This comes just one day after the Judiciary Committee received Agee's ABA rating (unanimous 'well qualified'). In other words, Leahy has moved Agee ahead of other circuit nominees whose ABA ratings have been available for several months to almost two years. This news only deepens concern that Senate Democrats will attempt to gut the Memorial Day deal.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (19) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 4:57pm on Apr. 15, 2008 6th Circuit Deal

By Curt Levey

The White House just announced that Helene White—a Democrat and ex-cousin-in-law of Sen. Carl Levin—will be substituted for Steve Murphy as a 6th Cir. nominee, with Murphy now being nominated to the Eastern District of Michigan. Ray Kethledge remains as the second 6th Cir. nominee from Michigan.

This is an okay deal given that 1) the best we can hope for from the election is a Republican president with an increased Democratic majority in the Senate, and 2) now even a Democratic president won't be able to wipe out the Republican majority on the 6th Circuit anytime soon. As an added benefit, there will finally be an end to Sen. Levin's ten-plus years of complaining about Helene White's failed nomination to the 6th Circuit during the Clinton Administration.

However, it is important that Senate Democrats not be allowed to claim that a hearing or vote on Helene White represents progress on judges—that is, use her as an excuse not to move some other circuit nominee. Her nomination and inevitable confirmation is a gift from the President to the Democrats, not the other way around.

Speaking of judges, let's hope for a speedy recovery by Sen. Arlen Specter, one of the GOP’s leading voices on the judges issue.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (5) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 1:27pm on Apr. 14, 2008 Judge Fight This Week?

By Quin

Here's what I wrote at the Spectator blog. Let's work this for all it's worth.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (10) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 2:58pm on Feb. 26, 2008 Good Luck, Jim Haynes

By Quin

Every reader of this site ought to send every good wish to Jim Haynes, retiring as Chief Counsel for the Pentagon, as he re-enters private life. This is a man who had served his country literally for decades, and who gave up highly lucrative employment for the last seven years in order to do so. He served well and honorably in extremely difficult times and circumstances, and has done yeoman's work to keep our country safe from international terrorists. Yet he remains the only Republican judicial nominee ever flat-out Borked by fellow Republicans. It was a travesty of justice that we should never forget or forgive. The lead Borker was the execrable Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and his wingman was putative presidential nominee John McCain. If McCain has any class, he will issue a statement thanking Haynes for his service to our country. (But I won't hold my breath for McCain to show any class. Strength and patriotism in serving the country he loves, yes; class, not a bit.) But I digress. This is a note about Haynes. Because he did not shrink from the service of his country, he truly, in Thomas Paine's words, "deserves the love and thanks of man and woman."

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (39) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 11:53pm on Feb. 23, 2008 Playing the Federalist Society Card

By Curt Levey

Philadelphia Federalist Society chapter president Judd Serotta has a good reply (see 4th letter to the editor) to a Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed which opined that 3rd Circuit nominee Shalom Stone’s “membership in the ultra-conservative Federalist Society has raised questions.” (emphasis added) Serotta decries the Inquirer’s playing of the Federalist Society card and notes that

The Federalist Society is the second-largest organization of lawyers in the country, with outposts in other countries as well. Although the membership is mostly conservative and libertarian, it also has hundreds of liberal and left members and routinely invites nonconservatives to speak at society events. It is a quintessential mainstream organization.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (16) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 3:30pm on Feb. 11, 2008 Worthy Nominees

By AndrewHyman

The New York Times has an editorial today about what it calls "Unworthy Nominees." Although critical of a district court nominee, the Times has no criticism for any circuit court nominee. So, how about some hearings for the circuit court nominees? Maybe hearings would reveal grounds for the Times to legitimately oppose more nominees, or maybe hearings would reveal that there are no legitimate grounds for opposition. Either way, hearings would be useful, right?

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (17) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 4:53pm on Jan. 28, 2008 More on McCain and Haynes

By Quin

For what it's worth, see what I wrote on this at the AmSpec blog.

Summary: McCain told Byron York he supported all those nominees not covered either way under the infamous Gang of 14 deal. BS. He actively opposed the superbly qualified, superbly judicious Jim Haynes.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (22) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 9:00am on Jan. 11, 2008 6th Cir. Obstruction and the MI Primary

By Curt Levey

Michigan is home to both the next presidential primary and the decade’s most outrageous obstruction of judicial nominees. Back in 2001, Sens. Levin and Stabenow started blocking Michigan nominees to the Sixth Circuit and they’ve persisted to this day. As a result, Steve Murphy and Ray Kethledge have gone more than a year and a half without so much as a hearing in the Judiciary Committee, despite the fact that the seats to which they are nominated are judicial emergencies.

The confluence of the primary and obstruction campaign by Michigan’s senators provides an opportunity for journalists to ask both the presidential contenders and Levin and Stabenow about the proper role of senators in the confirmation process. No doubt Levin and Stabenow will once again cite, as justification, the failure of two second-term Clinton appointees to the Sixth Circuit—one of whom is married to Levin's cousin—to get hearings. Besides being petty, that justification rings hollow, given that Levin and Stabenow have been offered “generous” compromises that would put the two Clinton nominees on the federal bench. But the senators “can't take yes for an answer,” to quote Detroit News editorials (9/13/04 & 11/25/01).

It’s a shame that Sen. Levin has forgotten his own words from the Clinton era:

“It is unconscionable to keep [judicial nominees] waiting. At a minimum, give people a hearing and vote them up or down. If members want to vote no, that is their choice. But not to give them a hearing is just unfair.” (Detroit News 10/17/99)

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (14) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 6:54pm on Dec. 6, 2007 First Circuit Nomination

By Curt Levey

U. S. District Court Judge William E. Smith of Rhode Island was nominated today to fill the First Circuit vacancy created by the retirement of the outstanding Bruce Selya. For a discussion of the selection process and prospects for confirmation, see the Providence Journal.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (48) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 8:31pm on Dec. 4, 2007 McConnell Blasts Nominee Standstill

By Curt Levey

On the Senate’s first day back from recess, Mitch McConnell blasted the Judiciary Committee for bringing “progress on circuit court nominations to a standstill.” McConnell noted that Sen. Leahy’s committee has fallen far short of the number of hearings held for Clinton’s circuit nominees during the comparable period. The four circuit court hearings held this year also fall far short of private assurances by Leahy’s staff that there would be one hearing per month for circuit nominees. And don’t even get me started about Reid’s promise to meet the historical average of 17 circuit confirmations, established during the final two years of the Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton presidencies.

McConnell’s full remarks on judicial nominees are below the fold.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (8) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 8:35am on Nov. 24, 2007 Washington Post Backs Rosenstein

By Curt Levey

In an editorial today, the Washington Post debunks the objections to Fourth Circuit nominee Rod Rosenstein by Maryland Sens. Mikulski and Cardin, and warns that

blocking Mr. Rosenstein's confirmation hearing – as the Maryland senators may yet do – would elevate ideology and ego above substance and merit, and it would unfairly penalize a man who people on both sides of this question agree is well qualified for a judgeship.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (3) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 9:21pm on Oct. 3, 2007 Elrod Up, Southwick Waits

By Curt Levey

As Andrew reported yesterday, Majority Leader Reid promised floor votes on “a circuit court judge and several district court judges” once the Senate completed consideration of the Defense appropriations bill. It was completed this evening, so Fifth Circuit nominee Jennifer Elrod will get a vote tomorrow. I have no doubt that she will be confirmed, so let me congratulate her in advance.

Andrew’s post speculated that the circuit nominee Reid was referring to might be Leslie Southwick, and Andrew had good reason to be hopeful. After all, Judge Southwick has been waiting for a floor vote longer than Elrod, and Sen. Reid promised a vote on Southwick by the Columbus Day recess, which begins at the end of this week. That obviously isn’t going to happen now. I don’t expect much from Democratic promises about judicial nominees, but why have GOP senators been silent about this unwarranted delay?

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (34) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 9:55am on Sep. 25, 2007 Tinder Testifies Today

By Curt Levey

When Seventh Circuit nominee John Tinder of Indiana has his hearing this afternoon, he will become the first of the recent appeals court nominees—also including Conrad (NC), Getchell (VA), Haynes (TX), Matthews (SC), and Stone (NJ)—to come before the Judiciary Committee. Given that he has the support of Democratic home state senator Evan Bayh—who will testify at Tinder’s hearing—I expect that he will be voted out of committee and confirmed in a timely manner.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (30) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 6:41pm on Sep. 21, 2007 Sen. Hatch on Racial Profiling of Judges

By Curt Levey

I like what Sen. Hatch had to say today about Democrats’ use of the race card during discussion of 5th Circuit nominee Jennifer Elrod at yesterday’s markup:

Democratic colleagues in the Judiciary Committee also questioned Judge Elrod’s fitness for the Fifth Circuit because of her race. One colleague said that we must consider the race of sitting judges as well as judicial nominees as we proceed through the confirmation process. The implications of this view are troubling, to say the least. This means that no matter what a nominee’s qualifications, no matter what her experience or background, no matter what she would bring to the bench, a nominee’s race can, and some apparently believe even should, trump her merit. Appointing judges based on race is an inappropriate standard that I cannot accept.

This June, the Committee for Justice documented the blatant use of race by Senate Democrats and their allies in their campaign to block Judge Leslie Southwick.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (18) / Email this page » / Read More »

Posted at 9:43am on Sep. 13, 2007 MD US Attorney for 4th Circuit

By Quin

The Wash Post reports that MD US Attorney Rod Rosenstein is likely to be the next Bush nominee to the 4th Circuit. Who knows about him? Comments welcome.

Posted in Circuit Courts — Comments (65) / Email this page » / Read More »