Specter Compromise?
By DanCT Posted in Senate Rules — Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »
In some selected comments from Senator Specter, CNN finds evidence that majority-supported nominees might be dumped without an up-or-down vote, just so Senators can save face:
"What this is really all about is saving face," the Pennsylvania Republican told CNN. "The institution of the Senate and the protection of minority rights is more important than the entire group [of nominees]."
This sounds like a remarkable break from his previous comments that what the Democrats are doing is a "constitutional revolution." Although he made this previous comment a couple years ago, I still can't imagine that he'd join the revolution, sacrifice nominees, and preserve the filibuster for judicial nominees, merely in order to give the Democrats a way to save face.

Recent comments
SG is certainly possible
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Kathleen Sullivan earns a victory; what might be in her future?
(2 years 34 weeks ago)vote scheduled Tuesday for Obama's first district court nominee
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Мысли...
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Ginsburg hospitalized after feeling faint
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Sotomayor joins cert pool
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Carl Tobias 9/23 article on filling 2nd Circuit COA vacancies
(2 years 34 weeks ago)Thx
(2 years 35 weeks ago)Great blog!
(2 years 35 weeks ago)It appears that Sonia Sotomayor has placed herself
(2 years 35 weeks ago)