Specter Compromise?

By DanCT Posted in Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

In some selected comments from Senator Specter, CNN finds evidence that majority-supported nominees might be dumped without an up-or-down vote, just so Senators can save face:

"What this is really all about is saving face," the Pennsylvania Republican told CNN. "The institution of the Senate and the protection of minority rights is more important than the entire group [of nominees]."

This sounds like a remarkable break from his previous comments that what the Democrats are doing is a "constitutional revolution." Although he made this previous comment a couple years ago, I still can't imagine that he'd join the revolution, sacrifice nominees, and preserve the filibuster for judicial nominees, merely in order to give the Democrats a way to save face.




Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative blog hosted by RedState and dedicated to confirmation of judicial nominees who will uphold the original intended meaning of the Constitution, using judicial restraint. Until 2009, this blog provided news and analysis regarding judicial confirmation battles in the U.S. Senate, and gave every American the opportunity to be heard in Washington. Now this blog is in a holding pattern, awaiting judicial nominations we can support. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments



©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service