Washington Post Backs Rosenstein

By Curt Levey Posted in Comments (3) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

In an editorial today, the Washington Post debunks the objections to Fourth Circuit nominee Rod Rosenstein by Maryland Sens. Mikulski and Cardin, and warns that

blocking Mr. Rosenstein's confirmation hearing – as the Maryland senators may yet do – would elevate ideology and ego above substance and merit, and it would unfairly penalize a man who people on both sides of this question agree is well qualified for a judgeship.

So blocking him "would elevate ideology and ego above substance and merit."

<sarcasm>
I'm sure glad we haven't seen anything like that before!
</sarcasm>

Reply To ThisUser Info#1 — Sat, 2007-11-24 10:37
will it make a difference? by Johnny Fontaine

While I'm glad to see the WaPo come out in support of Rosenstein, I'm not certain it'll make a difference. Both the WaPo and LA Times came out in support of Keisler, and little good it's done. Let's hope it helps.

Does anyone know what if anything can be done about the Dems not allowing a recess?

Reply To ThisUser Info#2 — Sat, 2007-11-24 13:29
Too little, by Classic

too late?

Reply To ThisUser Info#3 — Sat, 2007-11-24 18:41


Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative weblog organized by RedState dedicated to providing not only the most up-to-date news and analysis of the judicial confirmation battles in the United States Senate - but also giving every American the opportunity to let their voice be heard in Washington. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments

©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service