What counts?

By Irishlaw Comments () / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

I'm with Lorie on the "extraordinary circumstances" language -- the "discretion" thus far exercised by the filibustering senators hasn't inspired much confidence at all. But I wanted to highlight Dave's comment here, which offers good analysis: taking the three nominees now apparently not considered too extraordinary (Pryor, Owen, Brown), anyone else in their mold should also not be considered too extraordinary -- and if any such future nominees are filibustered, the rule change can then be exercised.

I'm not thrilled about this compromise but these three nominees are among the strongest. The fight isn't over (especially as we head into the summer with high court possibilities) but in the meantime, I will especially look forward to reading Judge Brown's opinions. (I recently had occasion to reread her dissent in Catholic Charities v. Superior Court -- sharp language, great analysis. Recommended reading.)




Click here to visit our sponsor SRC="http://ads.he.valueclick.net/cycle?host=hs0004665&t=std&b=indexpage&noscript=1;msizes=160x600,120x600;bso=listed">


 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password? new user?)


About ConfirmThem

ConfirmThem.com is a collaborative blog hosted by RedState and dedicated to confirmation of judicial nominees who will uphold the original intended meaning of the Constitution, using judicial restraint. Until 2009, this blog provided news and analysis regarding judicial confirmation battles in the U.S. Senate, and gave every American the opportunity to be heard in Washington. Now this blog is in a holding pattern, awaiting judicial nominations we can support. For info about our bloggers, see here.

Recent comments



©2006 Redstate, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service